joomla visitors
Your browser (Internet Explorer 6) is out of date. It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites. Learn how to update your browser.
X
Post

Are you able to submit a paper up to a scholarly, peer-reviewed log without PhD and obtain it accepted?

Are you able to submit a paper to a scholarly, peer-reviewed log without PhD? More especially, just just what is the smallest amount qualifications that will give one the chance associated with the paper being posted in a peer-reviewed medium that is academic?

11 Responses 11

Publishing a educational paper for book (and possibly setting it up accepted) doesn’t require any skills whatsoever. You do not need a PhD; you do not also must have attended university. There are not any academic, work, or account requirements after all.

That is not to say this’s an easy task to get yourself a paper accepted without any formal trained in the industry. Learning how exactly to compose a compelling paper is less difficult for those who have a mentor to provide guidance. But, if essay writter you’re able to work out how to get it done without having a PhD, in that case your insufficient a PhD won’t be held against you.

Yes, you can obtain a paper posted with out a PhD: PhD pupils do so on a regular basis. Presented documents are meant to be examined in accordance with what they state, maybe perhaps not who stated it.

Yes. In practice, graduate research is amongst the primary methods individuals achieve the relevant skills to create this type of paper, but a Ph.D. is certainly not a necessity. Skills could be a range of the journal that is individual but I do not understand of any that have an insurance policy of requiring degree qualifications from submitters. As an example, very often graduate or undergraduate students compose such documents.

Being an extreme instance, below are a few groundbreaking pre- or no-PhD discoveries:

Henri Lebesgue developed their famous integration concept as a new senior high school instructor in 1902.

Space–time block coding, a theoretical concept that happens to be important to cordless communications, ended up being created in 1997 by Siavash Alamouti being an exercising engineer having a master’s level.

The AKS primality test ended up being the consequence of 2002 undergraduate research at the Indian Institute of tech.

It is clear that such efforts warrant a book regardless of the writer’s status.

It is not only feasible however it is a necessity at numerous universities that your particular Ph.D thesis be entirely centered on peer evaluated documents.

Another problem this is actually the proven fact that in technology just the research outcomes should make a difference, maybe maybe maybe not that is presenting those outcomes. Then it should be rejected if Prof. Dr. X has submitted a paper that is found to be wanting. if someone in particular Y whom dropped away from main college, submits a paper containing cutting edge results, then that paper must be accepted. Then that would mean that science is not conducted in an independent way if this were not (in principle) true. Arguments from authority, instead of those on the basis of the merits would for some level corrupt the systematic procedure.

I’m much more skeptical compared to majority of the responses.

The very first explanation is more profane: you can find journals with an increase of reputation plus some with less reputation. The journals with an increase of reputation do have more visitors and it will foster your reputation if you are published in this paper. The direct impact is every person attempts to get posted within the many prestigous journals. And so the editors have swamped with documents and must select by concern. If two answers are similarly impressive, the likelihood that the greater amount of experienced and scientist that is reputable be posted is quite high.

And so the standard approach is to get hold of the journals in descending purchase of reputation and request book. Therefore, yes, you will be posted, however it is most most likely that a journal must be chosen by you with less reputation and therefore implies that your outcomes are usually ignored.

That get us towards the 2nd issue: then the editors will scan your paper more closely if you have an impressive result. Uncommon language (there clearly was a certain lingo you utilize in documents), strange structure (Word rather Latex) and a remarkable derive from a person who is certainly not understood before raises an alarm that is red. Then i say, nope, this is not remotely true if Anonymous Mathematica claims that “your lack of a PhD will not be held against you. It is extremely most most likely which you along with your paper aren’t scrutinized any longer and rejected. In the event that you take to to fight your decision, the label crackpot is attached with you faster than it is possible to inhale. So that you must certanly be incredibly careful to write a paper as amateur. Particularly since you will find journals that are therefore. problematic that publishing here will damage your reputation.

An endorsement is used by the arXiv system to ensure that only people from universities and research facilities can submit documents; other folks are locked down.

It is unfortunately necessary to contact someone from a university etc. which helps you to get through the barrier if you really have an impressive result: In both cases, arXiv and respectable journal.

Therefore, principially yes, but you can find barriers. Try not to underestimate the issue.

MODIFY: Some information upfront. The trustworthiness of the impact measures a journal element and since 2005 additionally because of the h-index. For 2013 Nature has ranking 7 into the effect factor with 38.6 and leads the h-index with 829. Technology has rank 20 (it is preceded by 9 (!) Nature specializations) and it is 2nd in the h-index with 801. Therefore pretty journals that are important. Nature provides a synopsis throughout the book procedure plus in reality the rejection price steadily increased from 89% to 92percent that I would phone “swamping”.

Corvus now claims that my analysis is glaringly incorrect and provides the explanation that other journals except Nature and Science don’t have the necessity to choose between documents, if i’ve grasped him right.
Corvus, it really is your declare that other high-reputable journals both by h-index and effect element would not have the situation with selecting a paper and consequently high rejection prices ? Do you really stay by your claim ? If my info is outdated or simply incorrect, I quickly will retract it, but We will research it. Glaringly incorrect, yes or no ?

JeffE, can you concur that being of user regarding the Computer Science Department in Illinois (which incidentally built the ORDVAC and ILLIAC and so are presently in charge of the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure) with a really long tradition and a very very own ACM chapter might offer a paper some suggestion ?

Leave a comment  

name*

email*

website

Submit comment